This is true.

But I just want to point out that if you have object X in library Y, you can
have *ALL authority to X, but if you don't have *USE on Y then you will not
be able to do anything to X.

So if PRUSERS was the only means of getting *USE or above to the given
library then you could argue that while PRUSERS authority does not apply to
the objects in the library, it is still protecting them.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Franz
Sent: 14 October 2009 04:26
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Authorization list for a library

no - if only the library is secured by the auth list, and not the objects
within the
lib - a library is itself an object.
An auth list secures objects.
Jim Franz

----- Original Message -----
From: "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:58 PM
Subject: Authorization list for a library

Authorization list for a library

Question: If a library is secured with:

"Object secured by authorization list . . . . . . . . . . . . PRUSERS"

then is every object in the library also covered by the authority list?

This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].