RE: Authorization list for a library

This is true.

But I just want to point out that if you have object X in library Y, you can
have *ALL authority to X, but if you don't have *USE on Y then you will not
be able to do anything to X.

So if PRUSERS was the only means of getting *USE or above to the given
library then you could argue that while PRUSERS authority does not apply to
the objects in the library, it is still protecting them.

Neill

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Franz
Sent: 14 October 2009 04:26
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Authorization list for a library

no - if only the library is secured by the auth list, and not the objects
within the
lib - a library is itself an object.
An auth list secures objects.
Jim Franz


----- Original Message -----
From: "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:58 PM
Subject: Authorization list for a library

Authorization list for a library

Question: If a library is secured with:

"Object secured by authorization list . . . . . . . . . . . . PRUSERS"

then is every object in the library also covered by the authority list?




--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.