I'm with Birgitta on this one.


On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Birgitta Hauser<Hauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I disagree, my former company was vendor, too and everything was journaled
and commitment control was heavily used. To switch off journaling or
commitment control was not possible, because we wanted to make sure that a
transaction is either completed or completely resettet.

What we did, if a client did not want to "waste" disc space, we reduced the
journal receiver size and did an automatic delete of the receiver as soon as
it was finished and the next one active. In this way we could guarantee that
all transactions were completed, but a complete restore or reset out of the
journal was not possible, but THIS is IMHO customer's choice or risk.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Birgitta Hauser

"Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." (Les
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." (Derek Bok)
"What is worse than training your staff and losing them? Not training them
and keeping them!"

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].