RE: PCML Enhancement requests

Gee thanks Jon;

Ill do my best but word smithen is not my forte.

Duane Christen


--


Duane Christen
Senior Software Engineer
(319) 790-7162
Duane.Christen@xxxxxxxxxx

Visit PAETEC.COM


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:13 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PCML Enhancement requests

Not yet - I'm trying very hard to be on vacation - but that news cvame in and I thiuyght someone (I think you just volunteered <grin>) could get it started. I'll be doing my thing there shortly.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



On 19-Aug-09, at 9:21 AM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Have you started a thread on the forum (I don't see one) to request
PCML improvements or am I missing something?

I agree that a fully functional PCML definition could be extremely
useful. I could see the binder using it for procedure overloading and
validating, dynamic binding, programmatically examining/listing/
documenting procedure interfaces, replacing copybook prototypes...

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.