Virtual Tape vs Savf -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Virtual Tape vs Savf
From: Gord Hutchinson <gordm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:03:16 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The thread on migrating without using tape got me thinking of something I'll
be setting up soon.

Weekly, I will be copying our production file library from or production
machine to our development machine. I was going to save to a savf and then
FTP that over.

Is there any benefit to using virtual tape instead of a savf?

Thanks

Gord

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Virtual Tape vs Savf , Lukas Beeler
RE: Virtual Tape vs Savf , Paul Nelson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.