× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
By ignore, do you mean have the OS update the record even if it is locked? I
would say that would be a big no.

No I wouldn't expect the OS to update the locked record,


Seems to me you would not want it to continue on it's merry way. An error
must be reported back to the .Net application to report the problem.

Actually, yes I would like it to continue on it's merry way. The
locked records would be missed, but they would be picked up the next
time around, which works fine for our purposes.

Apparently I'm not the only one to ask for this feature, IBM added it
to DB2 i at 6.1 and DB2 LUW at v9. MS SQL Server and Oracle both seem
to have a similar feature.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.