×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Scott Klement wrote:
Hans,
So it's your position that the fact that ls doesn't work the same as
Linux should be regarded as a bug and reported to IBM as such? Despite
that there's a really easy way to solve the problem that will work on i
and all Unix systems?
That's your position?
Or are you really just trying to create an argument?
Hey, you know I love a good argument!
Should the fact that qshell isn't quite compatible with Linux be
considered a bug by IBM? IBM would have to consider what benefit there
is to changing the ls command. That is, are there hordes of Linux
applications waiting to be ported to qshell?
Alternatively, you suggest that there's an easy way to code shell
commands in a manner that's compatible amongst all Unix and i systems.
Shall you be the one to try to convince Linux programmers to limit
themselves to the Posix command switches in order to facilitate porting
to qshell? Do you want to be asked by your Unix programmer friends
"What's an iSeries?"
Cheers! Hans
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
