Re: Keyed record-level access in CL

Adam,

If you would really prefer to use CL please send me a note offline.

Thanks,
Bruce

----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Glauser" <adamglauser@xxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: midrange.midrange-l
To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Keyed record-level access in CL

sjl wrote:

Adam wrote:
I was considering hoping to use CL in the first place
because I need to call some vendor commands that get pretty ugly for
QCMDEXC.


Adam -
I disagree. You must not be using free-form RPG.
[example removed]

Disagree all you want, but I still think that building a command string
for QCMDEXC is considerably uglier than calling a command in CL.
Particularly when you need to use MONMSG.

I know that I can use QMHRCVPM. I've done it, I've wrapped it in my own
procedure to make it nicer. It works and it isn't that bad, but in this
case it ends up being a bit cumbersome. That's what's great about ILE,
I can mix RPG and CL letting each do what it does best.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.