× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2009

Re: Storage pools and QHTTPSVR and QUSRWRK subsystems

Nathan

Are you sure about the units? You say mb - I'm not sure you can even HAVE 256K in a pool these days. Well, you can - just checked - but I can't imagine a machine running that small. This matters because your figures could weigh in on a customer matter here.

Now you say the the HTTP servers don't seem to need much memory - but they might if they are using CGI and some heavy-duty SQL.

Vern

Nathan Andelin wrote:
From: "Christen, Duane J."
I would like to move subsystems QHTTPSVR and QUSRWRK to
the same pool as QWAS6, but ...

For the heck of it, I changed subsystem description QHTTPSVR to use only pool *SPOOL to see what would happen. The HTTP servers still work fine. The only thing I noticed was that *SPOOL pool changed from .25 mb to 30.10 mb after a while - I have automatic performance tuning turned on.

Unlike WAS, the HTTP servers don't seem to need a lot of memory.

Nathan.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.