× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



not sure i agree with the 1988 AS400 could not run IBM i, IBM i is just
the latest version of OS 400, and the system has always supported OS 400.
I couldn't run windows XP on a PC that supported windows 3.1, But it
doesn't make it a different machine because there were upgrade to
technology in between.







jde iSeries schreef:
I will stop calling it an AS/400 when . . . [ fill in the blank ]What
will
it take for you to stop calling it an AS/400? at what architectural
change?
[When will I stop calling myself jde.iseries? ]
I am fully aware that a significant percentage of IBM insiders and IBM i
users still call it the AS400


The 1988 AS400 could not run IBM i, AIX, Linux, nor Windows on IXS or
IXA.






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.