Nick,
Good suggestion. Sure would have saved me some stress this morning. We have time critical data to process [Positive Pay stuff for the courts] and didn't need people harassing a bank teller because we didn't have the data to the bank when the person went to cash their checks.
What I did find was that this was logged at the time of the restore to the new hardware:
"LSOUTP0001 12/13/08 14:18:12
Text: Old member LSOUTPUT file TRSFTP/LSOUTPUT."
Normally the member is LSOUTPUT and the text is blank.
Thanks,
Fran Denoncourt
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Pinal County Treasurer's Office
Florence, AZ 85232
(520) 866-6404
Frances.Denoncourt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Receipt of this message does not grant you permission to send me
Unsolicited Commercial Email
On 12/16/2008 at 2:09 PM, in message <OF3E50EA43.38710FB4-ON86257521.00741D01-86257521.00743AD0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Nick_Radich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Fran,
Whenever I create a pgm that uses FTP, I change the Current Lib to QTEMP,
so the LSOUTPUT file is always put there. That way it is a brand new file
for each run, and I never have to worry about bumping against another job
that might be running FTP.
Thanx,
Nick
Nick Radich
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
EPC Molding, Inc.
Direct (320) 679-6683
Toll free (800) 388-2155 ext. 6683
Fax (320) 679-4516
nick_radich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Frances Denoncourt" <Frances.Denoncourt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
12/16/2008 02:47 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: FTP V5R4 Upgrade - LSOUTPUT error
Rob,
That's good that it is overwritten because we have maxmbrs set to 1.
So, digging around a little more, I found that on the test system the
member name is the same as the physical where on the production system it
was not [LSOUTP001]. So, I guess FTP was trying to add the new member
because the old one was not named as expected.
Don't know how that member got there on production, but I ran the job on
the test machine with the correct member name and it was fine.
I changed the pfm name to LSOUTPUT on production. Hopefully the 4:30 run
will be Ok. I'll check the member name after the 4:30 run.
Thanks for helping me out.
Fran Denoncourt
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Pinal County Treasurer's Office
Florence, AZ 85232
(520) 866-6404
Frances.Denoncourt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Receipt of this message does not grant you permission to send me
Unsolicited Commercial Email
On 12/16/2008 at 1:17 PM, in message
<OFE09A2618.BD3B5378-ON85257521.006F3483-85257521.006F6D7D@xxxxxxxxx>,
<rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ls *.txt (disk
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,10,1,213,158,129).
125 List started.
250 List completed.
ls *.txt (disk
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,10,1,213,206,200).
125 List started.
250 List completed.
ls *.txt (disk
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,10,1,213,215,92).
125 List started.
250 List completed.
DSPFD LSOUTPUT
Maximum members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : MAXMBRS *NOMAX
Number of members . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 1
DSPPFM LSOUTPUT
Looks like the one member just got overridden
Any chance the one member was removed and the file changed to MAXMBRS(0)?
Verify there's not a template higher up in the library list. With *ALLOBJ
authority do a
WRKOBJ *ALL/LSOUTPUT
Rob Berendt
midrange.com
