× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. December 2008

RE: 5798FAX vs V6R1

Rob,
Did you get the issues with 5798Fax on V6R1 resolved? We're scheduling a
system upgrade next month.

Thanks,
Steve

Steven Morrison
Fidelity Express





rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
12/05/2008 04:10 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: 5798FAX vs V6R1






IBM had me put on two other ptf's: SI32595 SI32626
That still left objects that failed ANZOBJCVN. They are working on a test

ptf. I already know the number.

Frankly, if the program product says
Release of base option . . . . . . . : V5R2M0
Then there shouldn't be any programs compiled to a level prior to V5R1M0
imnsho.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.