× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Jim

Like maybe QSYSNOMAX...... ? :)

I don't think you'd want too many of these running at the same time - though
the exact number would depend on the number of available processors and disk
arms.

There's a law of diminishing returns that applies when running too many of
the same kind job all at once. You just swamp the machine and it spends more
time managing the jobs than it does running them.

Regards
Evan Harris

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Franz
Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2008 5:06 p.m.
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: v6r1 strobjcvn

Pete - were your submitted jobs to a queue where
max active = *nomax?
To me that sounds like the difference between yours, Larry's, and Rob's
experience.
I don't think STROBJCVN *ALL does a massive convert many libs
simultaneously.
Jim Franz

.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.