× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Scott,

If people do think that IBM simply changed the name, then we have little
hope for the platform.

When S/38 and S/36 came together to be AS/400, it was a monumental day. 20
years later, when System i and System p came together to be Power Systems,
it was a monumental day.

To have something that monumental labeled as "changing the name yet again"
means that the IBM marketing in that regard has failed. Or maybe, everyone
is stuck in their "AS/400" world and ignored what just happened in Spring
2008.

Sad.
Trevor


On 11/17/08 3:06 PM, "Scott Klement" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A lot of this started with IBM changing the name YET AGAIN in spring.
They were already confused or frustrated with the name change from
iSeries to System i -- they already felt that the number of name changes
was absurd. When IBM changed it again in spring, they gave up in
frustration.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.