× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Or yet another option, if you have a newer iSeries, not real sure where it started, but the power 5
models all support this, you can set up the i5 as an iSCSI SAN, and have your Windows servers use that
for storage. I haven't done this, and I don't know the specifics, just that it can be done.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
Naughton
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:39 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Windows on an iSeries?

I'm looking or people who know more than I do, so of course I came right over here :-). My company is
looking to consolidate its windows servers, and I ran across this article:

http://www.infordata.net/inforweb.static/documents/newsletter/ISSE1007.pdf

that makes it sound as if we could do it all on our iSeries (we've got a model 9406-520). From the
article, it looked as if we could

* set up several windows servers using the Integrated xSeries Server cards

* dynamically allocate disk space among the iSeries and the various windows servers

* use our existing tape backup system to back up the windows data at the same time we're backing up
our iSeries data

Then we talked to our BP, who said it's not that simple. According to them,

** the integrated server cards aren't recommended because they're hard to upgrade, and we'd be better
off with the Integrated xSeries Adapters (and some boxes to put them in)

** the disk would need to be split between the windows servers and the iSeries, and we couldn't just
dynamically shift it around

** we'd need a separate LPAR to handle the windows stuff

** we'd be better off with a separate backup system for the window stuff

All of which makes it look a LOT less worth it, but I'm not convinced -- hence my question. Does
anyone have experience with either of these environments? Is it as great as the article makes it
sound, or is our BP closer to the mark? If we're looking to
centralize storage, management, and backup, is this a good option, or we better off just going with a
windows SAN (the other option)?

Thanks very much for your help,


Mike Naughton
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Judd Wire, Inc.
124 Turnpike Road
Turners Falls, MA 01376
413-863-4357 x444
mnaughton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
****************************************
NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to
the intended recipient, be advised that any use is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to it and then delete it from your computer.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.