×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
 
On 16/09/2008, at 1:08 AM, David FOXWELL wrote:
I have a request to restrict the use of a client update program  
depending on a user's authority level which is already coded in a PF.
And what's wrong with OS/400 security? Simply don't authorise this  
user to the program object and handle the exception when the call is  
made.
The program is an RPG called from a CL which is called from a menu.
I would like to be able to test the user's right to access the  
program in the RPG or CL and the use SNDPGMMSG to display the  
message at the bottom of the menu.
Is this before calling the "secure" program or IN the "secure"  
program? CHKOBJ can be used to verify authority to an object (or the  
QSYCUSRA API). Otherwise check the "security file" in your  
application. In both cases you can use SNDPGMMSG (or the QMHSNDPM  
API) to send an *ESCAPE message indication access denied.
I'm having trouble getting to grips with SNDPGMMSG. If I have :  
Menu, CLP1, CLP2 and I detect the message in CLP2, how do I get it  
the message to display on the menu?
SNDPGMMSG allows you to specify an invocation queue name and/or a  
relative invocation level. CLP2 can send directly to the menu by  
either knowing the name of its queue or by sending 2 levels above  
itself. Ideal is for CLP2 to send an *ESCAPE to its caller, which  
should monitor and resend the exception to its caller, which will  
automatically end up at the menu. This is STANDARD ERROR HANDLING and  
has been beaten to death previously. Search the archives.
I also have a sneaky feeling that this isn't the right way to go  
about the problem. Shouldn't there be a repertoire of programs with  
such a level of security and the level of security needed to access  
them?
I would always avoid security stored in a file and managed by the  
application. It is ALWAYS better to use the system facilities for  
securing object access.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
   FlyByNight Software         OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
   
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
   Phone: +61 2 6657 8251   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
   Fax:   +61 2 6657 8251                                   \ /
                                                             X
                 ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.