|
Joe Pluta wrote:It really was a trip. But it did make me realize that, in the end, there is no magic. It's 1's and 0's, and the computer does exactly what you tell it. The problem comes that as software becomes more complex, you abdicate more control (whether it's to a chip, a program, a language, or a framework) and the less you understand, the more it seems like magic.
Unfortunately, it didn't run so fine when plugged into the actual production box. Turns out the timing diagram on the USART chip didn't match the actual timing of when the chip presented an interrupt. The early interrupt caused a jump to an "unpredicted" location. The ICE slowed everything down enough that the interrupt didn't occur before we were ready for it <grin>.
Early Quantum Computing, eh? You can't debug the code without effecting it. <grin/>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.