× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Charles,

I ran the SP from iNav and it took a LOT longer. Just about as long as it
takes from the website. So now, what is different in the SP & just the SQL
running?

Debbie


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DebbieKelemen
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:57 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: SQL Performance Question

We are running the SQL statements. I will try it the other way and see what
happens.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wilt, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:28 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SQL Performance Question

Debbie,

When you say, "Yet, if we take the SQL and run it in Navigator", what do you
mean?

Are you running the SQL statements from the SP in iNav or are you actually
calling the SP from iNav?

If you're not actually calling the SP, then do so. If the performance of
the SP from iNav is good,
then the problem is outside the System i.

How is the web team calling the SP?

Charles Wilt
--
Software Engineer
CINTAS Corporation - IT 92B
513.701.1307

wiltc@xxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DebbieKelemen
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:54 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: SQL Performance Question

We have some "SQL" processes that were written by our web development
team.
They were made into stored procedures on the iSeries. When they run for
our
website, they take 15 or 20 seconds, some times more to run. Yet, if we
take the SQL and run it in Navigator, it takes about 450 ms to run.

Any ideas on how to improve the performance of these stored procedures?

I have created the "suggested" indexes and still no improvement.

Debbie Kelemen
Sr. Programmer / Analyst
CHEFS
719-272-2617
dkelemen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.chefscatalog.com

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be
confidential and privileged. If you receive this e-mail and you are not a
named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read,
print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of
the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message
was misdirected. After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and
any attachments from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting
this error is appreciated.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.