× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Aaron Bartell wrote:
I actually upgraded to two 22" monitors for awhile, but believe it or not
that made my neck sore because I was going back and forth so often across
almost four feet of monitor - crazy :-) I think I will try it again but
take a different approach in how I use the two 22" monitors and put the
lesser used apps on the monitor that isn't right in front of me.
I have the same issue: too *much* physical real estate causes problems. The 24" monitor (I got an HP LP2465 on a screaming deal for $399 a while back) pretty much takes up my entire peripheral vision. Any more and I turn into a bobble-head. And 1900x1200 is really a whole lot of space; it's equivalent in pixels to nearly two monitors running at 1280x1024.

Also, two years ago I had the issue that I was running through a KVM, and it's hard to find dual-monitor KVMs. I still use a KVM, but with the wonders of virtualization I almost never switch anymore - I'm down from four Windows machines and a Linux box to one Windows server and one Windows workstation.

Joe



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.