Re: Product library vs SBMJOB -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Product library vs SBMJOB
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:07:39 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I can get by this. Just wondering what the general consensus is about this. In other words, should SBMJOB carry over the product library? Should I DCR this? Maybe I should report this to my software vendor exactly where the error occured. Maybe they missed adding a product library to a particular command.

The PRDLIB is set by commands when they are invoked ... so unless the SBMJOB is invoking a command that sets the PRDLIB, I don't think it should be carried over in the inherited job environment.

This is, of course, a bit at odds with other entries in the library list ... as system library list entries and user library list entries are carried over.

david

Follow-Ups:

Re: Product library vs SBMJOB , Simon Coulter

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.