Re: Command programming

InfoCenter is *much* improved. However I am still very partial to _reference_ manuals where the subject matter warrants. For example, designing and creating command definition objects and related features [validity checking & choice programs, etc.], to provide an interface to a CPP. And I very much dislike the .pdf for manuals, which is all there is from InfoCenter for manuals; I still prefer BookManager over PDF. The negative moniker will be hard to let go, regardless of improvements, even if only because using such monikers makes me grin as I write; like writing either WinBlows or WinDoze for another function with a long history of constantly frustrating me :-) So as long as I have better luck using Google to find what I want in InfoCenter, I will not look on the InfoCenter fondly.

Regards, Chuck

Dan wrote:

CRPence wrote:

InfoCrap. Need I say more? ;-) <<SNIP>>

I thought I remembered that InfoCenter was vastly improved a few
releases ago. I do remember pining for the old CD-ROMs from the V3
days when InfoCenter first came out. <<SNIP>>