× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. March 2008

Re: Giving users "deposit" access to an output queue.

Hi Rob,

Have you tried changing the data authorities of the outq to Add only?

*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> /

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I want users to be able to put any spool file into a particular output queue. However, once it is there, they cannot delete it, etc. They're interfering with FAX/400.

I tried creating the output queue with AUTCHK(*DTAAUT) and making *PUBLIC *USE however they could still delete the spool file. If I make it *EXCLUDE they cannot deposit. So I left it *EXCLUDE and they could do a SBMJOB and that process (running under a different profile) would then put it into that output queue. However, they could still delete the spool file while it was in that output queue.

I have "Display any file" set to *NO.

With this authority they cannot display or delete other spool files on that output queue, however they can still abuse their own and I'd like to stop that.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.