Generalizations from either side are.... generalizations. If the PF
has 500M rows, most would not consider having to wait for the access
path to rebuild as /no stress, no mess/. The IBM recommendation to keep
the PF & LF in the same library remains, even with new function in V6R1.
No more comment in this poorly titled thread that already appears as a
response to a message in a prior unrelated existing thread.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact