Generalizations from either side are.... generalizations. If the PF has 500M rows, most would not consider having to wait for the access path to rebuild as /no stress, no mess/. The IBM recommendation to keep the PF & LF in the same library remains, even with new function in V6R1. No more comment in this poorly titled thread that already appears as a response to a message in a prior unrelated existing thread.

Regards, Chuck

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].