If you name the fields, you can substitute a literal for the missing
Select field1a as firstfield, '' as secondfield from file1
Select field2a, field2b from file2
Order by 1
TS Water Valley
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bradley V. Stone
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 15:08
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SQL Question - Merging files or result sets?
Ok, Darn. Almost worked. I found out the file in production (fileB)
have one extra field at the end.
Message ID . . . . . . : SQL0421 Severity . . . . . . . : 30
Message type . . . . . : Diagnostic
Date sent . . . . . . : 03/13/08 Time sent . . . . . . :
Message . . . . : Number of UNION operands not equal.
Cause . . . . . : The operands of a UNION or UNION ALL must have the
number of columns.
Recovery . . . : Correct the SQL statement so that it has the same
of operands in each SELECT list.
Is this telling me it won't work because the files don't have the same
number of coumns?
For select I'm using select * and fetching into a DS defined externally
Bradley V. Stone
BVSTools - www.bvstools.com
eRPG SDK - www.erpgsdk.com
This thread ...
RE: SQL Question - Merging files or result sets?, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact