On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Mike Cunningham <mcunning@xxxxxxx> wrote:Yes, it is. But the system *always* saves PF access paths, no matter
Isn't there also some implications for backups? If the PF is keyed you can't backup the data without also backing up the index since it is all in one object. If the PF is un-keyed you can choose to backup the key if you think that is in your own best interest, by backup up the logical files.
Isn't this about SAVLIB ACCPTH(*NO) and QSAVACCPTH? I think this
controls if you save access paths (which i believe is the IBMism for