×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
DSPT (and SNADS) actually runs over APPC. They're just two different types of applications (with related architecture, etc).
Since we're talking LPARs I would go with TELNET. TELNET, unless you do something really unusual, is going to negotiate 5250 data stream and so all should be good. If you had physically separate systems, then I would go with whatever your current network is based on. If SNA, DSPT. If TCP/IP, TELNET. While you can run APPC over TCP/IP it's intended more for convenience and, in your case, would just be adding an unnecessary layer.
I would also suspect that TELNET is considered more "strategic" from IBM than DSPT (though I certainly am not speaking for IBM -- just thinking out loud).
Bruce Vining
http://www.brucevining.com/
Integrated solutions for the System i user community
ALopez@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Just a little aside -- for your "dumb tube" access across LPARs you
might want to take a look at the RMTUSR, RMTPWD, RMTINLPGM,
RMTINLMNU, RMTCURLIB, etc parameters of the TELNET command.
Bruce Vining
Thanks for mentioning them. What advantages would there be in using
Telnet over passthru (DSPT)? I know DSPT uses SNADS, but SNADS works over
TCP/IP now, doesn't it?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
