×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I do not know how well I could explain recursive queries, but what
was your stated understanding, seems to do some justice, at least for
the simple case of generating successive rows from one row. However,
that example has no specific join selection back to the prior generated
data and its initial set is only the one row. The prior set of rows
that were generated are visible to the set which is currently being
generated into the temporary result table. In this case, both the first
and each successive row being generated is [a set of] one row; being
generated and then included by the UNION ALL.
In this case the new\generated row has a value that is just a counter
to enable stopping the generation of new rows. A different method to
stop could be employed, having generated new rows that have no real
relationship to to the result set of the prior iteration. Take for
instance the given example, use WHERE RANV NOT IN (0, 1) as the escape
from generating more rows, instead of RNum<100; i.e. stop adding of rows
when an inclusive boundary value is generated by the RAND().
First the WITH statement establishes a CTE [Common Table Expression]
against which to recurse
Second there is the first row(s) generated in the CTE, called the
/initialization fullselect/ to which recursive UNION ALL data will be
appended
Third there is a UNION ALL to include the already generated first
row(s), requesting to combine the additional generated rows for each
successive iteration
Fourth there is the recursive reference [to itself, to the CTE] with
some logic to generate more rows and [there should be] logic to stop
generating, called the /iterative fullselect/; run until either no
further matches in a join or the selection excludes the rows being generated
The following query generates for its initialization, the three odd
integer values of 1, 3, & 5. Then it generates +1 values for each of
those values, recursively generating plus-one results of the prior set
up to the integer value seven. The query results are shown in report
form later, but also shown here another way. The three odd values,then
each adding one, produces the following results; each set divided by a
semicolon:
1 3 5; 2 4 6; 3 5 7; 4 6; 5 7; 6; 7;
Represented another way, each set on a new line:
The initial set is 1 3 5
1st generated set is 1+1 3+1 5+1
2nd generated set is 2+1 4+1 6+1
3rd generated set is 3+1 5+1 /* 7+1 is excluded per *GT 7 */
4th generated set is 4+1 6+1
5th generated set is 5+1 /* 7+1 is excluded per *GT 7 */
6th generated set is 6+1
<code>
with
three_odds (oddval) as
( select int(1) from sysibm.sysdummy1
union all
select oddval+2 from three_odds
where oddval < (7-2)
)
,uptoseven (oddplusone) as
( select oddval from three_odds
union all
select int(oddplusone+1) from uptoseven
where oddplusone < 7
)
select oddplusone from uptoseven
....+....1....
ODDPLUSONE
1
3
5
2
4
6
3
5
7
4
6
5
7
6
7
******** End of data
</code>
Regards, Chuck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.