×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I think you have found a very interesting bug in the rand() function! I guess you should have the honor to report it to IBM.
Very interesting finding. Although I agree that it is rather uncommon, given a large enough sample, this could break your programs.
Thank you, Loyd!
luis
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:34 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SQL RAND function question
Hi Luis,
Changing to floor() made no appreciable difference. Here is the revised
program and results. The workaround I see so far is to calculate 0-12,
but use only 0-11. The results for the topmost number are so small they
would not skew the distribution.
d x s 10i 0 inz
/free
exec sql set option commit=*none;
for x = 1 to 10000;
exec sql insert into loyd/randno (number)
values(floor(rand()*11));
endfor;
*inlr = *on;
return;
/end-free
10,000:
....+....1....+....2....+....3
NUMBER COUNT ( * )
0 931
1 934
2 922
3 913
4 906
5 896
6 908
7 934
8 851
9 920
10 884
11 1
******** End of data ********
100,000:
....+....1....+....2....+....3
NUMBER COUNT ( * )
0 9,196
1 9,045
2 8,989
3 9,204
4 9,174
5 8,925
6 9,169
7 9,122
8 9,162
9 8,921
10 9,091
11 2
******** End of data ********
1,000,000:
....+....1....+....2....+....3
NUMBER COUNT ( * )
0 90,792
1 91,277
2 90,710
3 91,019
4 90,531
5 91,222
6 90,865
7 90,754
8 90,962
9 90,898
10 90,947
11 23
******** End of data ********
Loyd Goodbar
Senior programmer/analyst
BorgWarner
TS Water Valley
662-473-5713
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luis Colorado
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 09:09
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SQL RAND function question
Loyd,
This is a bit surprising. Every implementation that I have seen of
rand() or rnd() in other languages gives a random number in the
following range: [0,1)
I would say that maybe there is a bug in the cast to int, which
apparently rounds up to 1 the number 0.99999999... at some unknown
precision.
Would you try this again, using floor() instead of the cast? Something
like
exec sql insert into loyd/randno (number)
values(floor(rand()*11));
It would be interesting to see if the problem is the cast or the rand()
function itself.
Great job!
Luis
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.