Re: Strange CL problem with SUBR

["Peter Dow (ML)" <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Luis,

In Adam's example, which I tested, it *does* stop at the SUBR statement, 
*except* when MONMSG is the statement preceding the SUBR.  Hard to see 
how you'd want to take advantage of that...

*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> /

Luis Colorado wrote:
> Well, it would be *less* unfortunate. As I said, some people may actually have code using this quirk -not stopping at a SUBR statement- intentionally, or eve unintentionally, so if IBM fixes is, IBM may actually break the code of that people.
>
> I know it's an unlikely scenario, but I don't like seeing fixes that break existing code. That's one of the success secrets of the iSeries.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Crispin Bates
> Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:40 PM
> To:	Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject:	Re: Strange CL problem with SUBR
>
> Why is it unfortunate if they fix it? It is clearly a bug, and is not 
> working as documented.
>
> Still, as Adam pointed out, there's already a PTF for it...
>
>