× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



<snip>
Finally, if none of these points sway you and you insist that you must
write
your software so that it can be installed in environments where the
library
list cannot be pre-determined, then the obvious answer is to save the
current library list, change to what you need, and then restore the
original
when you're done. I've done that a lot in my time.
<snip>


SSA did this with BPCS.





Thanx,

Nick



Nick Radich
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
EPC Molding, Inc.
Direct (320) 679-6683
Toll free (800) 388-2155 ext. 6683
Fax (320) 679-4516
nick_radich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



"Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/14/2008 11:22 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: QTEMP cleanup






From: Elvis Budimlic

I can tell you from experience that if you assume anything pertaining to
the system's environment, you'll inevitably be bitten in the ??? as some
shop's environment will differ.

(...snip...)

To summarize, use QTEMP in commercial software but make sure you
implicitly qualify its usage.

So do you hardcode every object reference? Because if you don't, how can
you assume that the user will have your non-QTEMP libraries in their
library
list? I think the concern that you have absolutely no control over the
library list is perhaps a little overstated.

I suppose the use of QTEMP specifically could be a problem if two of your
packages somehow conflict, with one needing QTEMP at the end of the
library
list and one needing it at the beginning. However, there's no good reason
to require a library be at the END of the library list. If its object
names
conflict with other objects in the library list, then the objects wouldn't
be found anyway unless you were hardcoding the library name, at which
point
you wouldn't need the library in your library list at all! And if they
don't conflict, it doesn't matter where the library is in the library
list.

Finally, if none of these points sway you and you insist that you must
write
your software so that it can be installed in environments where the
library
list cannot be pre-determined, then the obvious answer is to save the
current library list, change to what you need, and then restore the
original
when you're done. I've done that a lot in my time.

Joe


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.