|
From some people who work (programming) with dot-net, I've heard less than complementary things. They still say it's the future blah blah, but IMHO the MS behemoth has lost its luster. I think Firefox and Google are showcase examples of what open-source software can do vis-a-vis Microsoft, and it seems to me that a lot of companies use MS OS's and applications simply because, so far, it's all their tech staff knows, and the structuring of their technical departments surrounds MS stuff.
Haven't you just identified the problem?
Programmers are between the user and the tool, so if it does not work for
the user, how can you claim that it is outstanding for "the programmer"?
While a tool may be "outstanding", isn't the measure of the tool in the
end-applications created by "the programmer" using the tool?
Welcome back to System i...
On 1/2/08 11:17 AM, "Steve Richter" <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
for the programmer, microsoft's products are outstanding. as an end user I
find a lot of their stuff wanting.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.