×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I rarely use multi-member tables. When I do, it is to save month-end
date in an archive or to replace the S/36 workstation (?WS?) file
processing that proliferates throughout this old software.
After Charles replied, I did a search (ask.com) and found a pretty
recent (12 months ago; that still qualifies as "recent" even for us,
right?) on partitioned tables by Mike Cain. Didn't read the whole thing
but skimmed it. Pretty good documentation, but didn't read enough to
see if it would help - if I had DB2 multisystem, which I don't.
Thanks.
* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
615.995.7024
fax
615.995.1201
email
jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Remember, you qualified that with "if I want/need 2-n members in a table".
One alternative is to NOT use multiple members.
Another option is to use the SPENDMONEY command and purchase DB2 multi
system so that you can use "partitioned" tables. This, in effect, uses
multiple members. Grinds me that IBM requires that product to use
partitioned tables though.
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
