×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Which are you running in debug: The CL, or the RPG? Or, where are you
seeing the error; CL or RPG?
Something probably totally tangential, and I'm no expert on the CL to RPG
ILE stuff, is perhaps changing
CALLPRC PRC(EXISTS) PARM((&BUDBAKNAME) (&OBJTYPE) +
(&OBJLIB)) RTNVAL(&VALID)
to
CALLPRC PRC(EXISTS) +
PARM((&BUDBAKNAME *BYVAL) (&OBJTYPE *BYVAL) +
(&OBJLIB *BYVAL)) +
RTNVAL(&VALID)
Since your RPG uses CONST.
Now, I fail to see how you'd get an error in the RPG based on this. &VALID
is not passed IN.
Therefore, if your RPG does something like
ReturnVar= IbmAPI(POBJECT:POBJECTILIB,POBJECTTYPE);
return ReturnVar;
Then I do not see how the manipulation of ReturnVar would be affected by
whether or not it is called by CL.
Zooming around again. If you want to suspect the black helicopters of CL
then you could always try changing the size of ReturnVar and &valid from
1A to 2A. I think I've heard something in a beer soaked brain cell
somewhere about 1A being a problem child going from CL to RPG.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
