×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.





Eric,

Thanks for the link.

Walden,
Thanks for your answer. Don't know about any particular
weed, but I don't remember anything about SETOBJACC being
deprecated. In fact, I worked as a consultant for a
customer who liked to use SETOBJACC for their ennding of
month processes. Thay had this iSeries with LOTS of memory
and if the pools we were only a little out of memory
everything went down the drain.

Elvis, this is a small 520, but I'll check your idea for
the smaller files. Thanks.

Thanks to all,

Luis




--- midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


------------------------------

message: 4
date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:31:37 -0600
from: "DeLong, Eric" <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: Improving SQL Update perfomance

I'd be surprised to hear that.... Perhaps you're
thinking of Expert Cache, which manages storage pool
paging (*CALC in the stoarge pool paging option).....
Here's an article I found:

http://www.itjungle.com/fhg/fhg121306-story03.html

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Walden H. Leverich
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:15 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Improving SQL Update perfomance


I recall hearing somewhere (from an IBMer?) that
SETOBJACC is
effectively a No-Op these days. That is to say, you can
call it (so
existing code doesn't go boom) but it doesn't do
anything. IIRC, this
was V5R2-ish time.

Then again, I could be smoking dope.

-Walden
--
Walden H Leverich III
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x3051
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Elvis Budimlic
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:08 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Improving SQL Update perfomance

If you have lots of main memory consider using SETOBJACC
command to
prebring
the entire file into memory prior to running the UPDATE.

Elvis

Celebrating 10-Years of SQL Performance Excellence on IBM
i5/OS and
OS/400
www.centerfieldtechnology.com

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Improving SQL Update perfomance

Hi list,

What would be the best way to improve the performance of
a SQL Update statement executed with RUNSQLSTM?

I need to run the following SQL for several tables:

UPDATE LIBNAME/TABLE SET
Field1 = round(field1 / 1000, 2),
Field2 = round(field2 / 1000, 2),
...
Fieldn = round(fieldn / 1000, 2);

Each one of these tables can have several thousands of
records. One of them has 15 million of records, and the
process is VERY slow.

Thanks in advance,

Luis

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the
archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



Luis Rodriguez

IBM Certified Systems Expert
eServer i5 iSeries Technical Solutions


____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how. http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.