|
*** REPLYING TO A POST IN RPG400-L
Vernon Hamberg wrote:
> I think your mileage will vary, but it's generally a good idea to
> move to ILE, even with CL. I read some estimate once, think it was
> either 20% improvement or 20% of the runtime.
Performance aside ... I think moving from OPM CL to ILE CL isn't
necessarily a good idea in all cases.
It's been my experience that the change in environments between the two
language environments is pretty radical ... and programs that work fine
in one environment can often fail miserably in the other.
Depending on how you invoke the CL programs, override behavior in
activation groups can be pretty disruptive.
Clearly it can be programmed for ... but a wholesale conversion from one
to the other is not recommended without careful analysis.
david
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.