× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



johnking@xxxxxxx wrote:
For example, ScottK recently published a clever QShell script (see link #1
below) to copy spool files to HTML. The instructions described placing the script
in /usr/bin which, if I understand correctly (see link #2) is akin to C:\WinNT or
QSYS.lib. Other utilities may create their own directories in /root or place a
.jar file somewhere in /Javautil. Or whatever.

Hmmm... well, that's an interesting question, and open to debate (so this is probably a great place to post it, right?)

On a Unix system, you'd typically have the following directories:

/bin = binary (programs)
/lib = library (unix equiv of service programs)
/var = variable (data that changes frequently, like logs, e-mail, etc)
/usr = user (stuff thats used by users, not just admins)
/tmp = temporary (self explanatory)
/etc = et cetera (configuration files.)
/home = stuff that's specific to a given user.

Originally, configuration files were stored all over the place, and only those that didn't fit anywhere else would go into /etc. But it evolved into the "right" place for configuration, and many people now refer to this directory using the backronym "editable text configuration" for etc.

Then, because there can be programs, libraries, and so forth that are used by users, not just admins, you'd have

/usr/bin
/usr/lib
/usr/etc

And, certain users might have their own programs, not globally available, so you'd have:

/home/myuserid/bin
/home/myuserid/lib
/home/myuserid/etc

Many unixes also separate stuff used for "system" purposes (i.e. stuff used by admins only) from those that are available to everyone. For example, FreeBSD has /bin and /sbin for normal programs and system-related programs. (and /usr/bin and /usr/sbin)

Many systems also have a /usr/local directory for things that are specific to the current installation. Like your DR example, stuff that you'd want to save/restore to set up your system on another machine would be in /usr/local (and /home) so you don't have to restore the entire /usr directory.

As with the others, this is broken into subdirectories

/usr/local/bin
/usr/local/sbin
/usr/local/etc
/usr/local/lib

So that's the basic idea, on Unix machines, though every different Unix environment (UNIX, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, IRIX, Minix, Linux, BSD, etc) has their own interpretation of these basic directory structures. For example, in Linux distros, if you install software from their packages (for example, RPMs) it goes into the subdirectories of /usr, since it's not considered a per-site thing, lots of people have that software. However, on FreeBSD, packages go into /usr/local since they're not included with the OS. and therefore, some shops will have them and some won't.

You'll note that IBM includes a directory called /QIBM in the IFS. They put that there so that their stuff is set apart from everyone else's stuff...

It might be wise to do the same thing with your own software. Create a /JohnsCompany directory (not sure who you work for off the top of my head) and put all of your stuff inside that, so that that's all you have to back up.

Or perhaps use /usr/local for that purpose (though, a lot of packaged software will go into /usr/local by default, such as Zend's stuff, so it might be smarter to make your own.)

The other thing that seems to continually throw me for a loop is the QOpenSys directory. Since Unix stuff is case-sensitive, IBM made a different file system for case-sensitivity, and put everything Unix-like in it. So we have /qopensys/usr, etc.

That's irritating, since most Unix software expects /usr, and here IBM has put things in /qopensys/usr. So I typically have /usr be a symbolic link to /qopensys/usr, and put everything in /qopensys/usr. But that's not the default configuration.

I find it difficult to figure out how much to explain and not explain about directory structures, etc, when writing articles about Unixy things like QShell and PASE. If I'm in a hurry, and don't want to deal with 10000 questions about how to set up your PATH, I just go ahead and tell people to put stuff in /usr/bin -- it may not be the best course going forward, but it's much easier.

The people who are comfortable enough with the IFS to ask the question ("is this the best place?") will usually figure out how to move it!

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.