|
On 8/20/07, Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes. Those are DP managers from the 70s.
And they dominate the contractor world. maybe you live in a fantasy
land where you don't have to deal with DP managers from the '70s, but
I don't.
For anyone who knows, RPGIV and ILE are the current invocations of the
language. You can find education for them all over. Cycle education is much
thinner. And, when you get there, you have less maintenance, and are more
modern. Show me an RPG cycle program that is truly modular? How about
documentation of what is happening in the RPG cycle? A COBOL programmer
could not read a cycle program for trying (wtf is *INZSR anyway) but they
can read RPGIV free format.
what "training" is needed? the cycle can be learned by reading a
single chapter in the RPG manual and for those who still don't get it,
one competent person taking two minutes to walk through a simple
example.
And, fwiw, moving FORWARD is always a good thing in our industry. Staying
with your 25 year old code is not going to help if IBM gets a clue and
starts making us pay to compile old code...
I'm all for moving forward and will use ILE techniques when writing
new stuff if the client has no preference or prefers I do. But if it
means the difference between getting the gig or going without, I'll
choose to get paid.
I have to ask - would you advise a new rpg programmer to _not_ learn
what the cycle does? if so, why?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.