RE: script to change Client Access .ws profiles

The ones I have used:
IBM Client Access and Attachmate's Reflection 2007 (Extra!/Reflection).
Mochasoft also says they do but I have never used their client SSL.

Also I've never noticed a slow down for using a 5250 SSL connection, but
that doesn't mean there isn't one. Also as a note, most iSeries shops I go
into are NOT using SSL...however most shops do require an SSL client to
their UNIX systems.

Matt Graybiel
NetIQ

-----Original Message-----
From: John Earl [mailto:john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 12:47 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: script to change Client Access .ws profiles

Bryan,

Good question, and I suppose that I should know this (but I don't -
that's why I hang out here :), what are some of the 5250 telnet clients
that support SSH?

jte

--
John Earl, VP and Chief Technology Officer
PowerTech: 253-872-7788
Direct: 253-479-1408
Mobile: 206-669-3336
John.Earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




Email is an excellent way to communicate material that is not time
sensitive. If your communication is of a more urgent nature, please
call.

===========================
This email message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
the intended recipient named above and may contain information that is
privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you
received this email message in error, please immediately notify the
sender by replying to this email message or by telephone and delete the
message from your email system. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryan Dietz
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:27 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: script to change Client Access .ws profiles

what about an initial SSH tunnel setup then a telnet session over(or
would it be thru?) that tunnel.
Not sure about the performance impact.

Bryan


John Earl said the following on 8/15/2007 11:26 AM:

Thanks Steve,

And I guess my comments stem from the fact that I have turned very,

very

sour on QDSIGNON. It is a big problem, and has been for many years,

and

I don't see any better solution than bypassing the signon screen.

I'm working with two customers now who are forcing SSL on all telnet
sessions because of the @%#$@!&! unencrypted and unsecured QDSIGNON
screen.

jte

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.