Re: CPI9E64

[Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Well the license key information looks correct. The 'mystery message' 
though would make me want to talk to support to find out what's going 
on!  It's almost as if it's repeatedly re-installing the key which 
clearly doesn't seem normal!

 - Larry

Jerry Adams wrote:
> I installed Cume 7107 for V5R4 on one of our 520's last week.  Since 
> then QSYSOPR gets dozens of informational messages (CPI9E64) every day: 
>
> Message . . . . :   License key information installed for 
> 5722SS1.          
> Cause . . . . . :   License key information was installed for product 
> 5722SS1
>   license term V5 feature 
> 5051.                                             
>
> Our other 520, which also has V5R4 installed but not 7107, does not have 
> these messages (that I have been able to find, anyway).  The WRKLICINF 
> has the following:
>
> Product ID  . . . . . . . . :   5722SS1            
> License term  . . . . . . . :   V5                 
> Feature . . . . . . . . . . :   5051               
> Description . . . . . . . . :   i5/OS              
>                                                    
> Compliance type . . . . . . :   *KEYED             
> Usage type  . . . . . . . . :   *PROCESSOR         
>                                                    
> Usage limit . . . . . . . . :   1                  
> Last update . . . . . . . . :   00/00/00  00:00:00 
>                                                    
> Threshold . . . . . . . . . :   1                  
>                                                    
> Usage count . . . . . . . . :   .43                
>                                                    
> Peak Usage Information:                            
>   Peak usage  . . . . . . . :   .43                
>   Last peak . . . . . . . . :   06/09/04  10:17:40 
>                                                    
> Log violations  . . . . . . :   *NO 
>                                     
> Message queue/Library . . . :   *NONE
>                                     
> Keyed compliance information:       
>   Expiration date . . . . . :   *NONE
>   Grace period  . . . . . . :   0   
>   Date grace period expires :   *NONE
>
> I'm just curious what gives, plus whether or not it can potentially bite 
> me in the butt.
>
> Thanks.
>
>