× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yep, that helps, thanks!

The question we're dealing with now is 'how did this particular profile get
disabled without a message to QSYSMSG?'. I know that it can be disabled
manually without producing a message but I don't think that is what happened
in this case.

We're still checking and watching.

Thanks,

Steve

<rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mailman.12362.1182349304.13580.midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CPF1393 specifically states: "Subsystem &1 disabled user profile &2 on
device &3." Are they using QUSRWRK for 5250 emulation? Or, are the jobs
in question some sort of server job? Like, iNav, etc.

I tried using iNav with a new user profile. Created a second connection
to an existing machine. Signed on as a new user. Used 8 or 9 invalid
passwords. Never did get a disabled message. HOWEVER QMAXSGNACN is set
to 1 disable device only, not the profile.

So, I changed that system value from 1 to 3. And tried the iNav thing
again. Now QSYSMSG shows:
Subsystem QUSRWRK disabled user profile ROBMCK on device *N.

Is that what you were looking for?


Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Steve McKay" <steve.mckay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
06/20/2007 10:14 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Fax to

Subject
Monitor for disabled user profile from sbs other than QINTER






I have a CL program that is monitoring QSYSMSG for CPF1393, which
indicates
that a user profile was disabled. The program sends a message to our help

desk so they can be proactive about re-enabling and educating the user.
This works perfectly for user profiles disabled in the QINTER subsystem.

Recently, we began having a problem with a certain profile being disabled
by
QUSRWRK. My CL program does not pick up a CPF1393 in QSYSMSG when
QUSRWRK
disables a user profile.

For V5R4, should QUSRWRK place CPF1393 into QSYSMSG when it disables
profiles? If not, does it generate the message into another message
queue?



Thanks,

Steve


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.