RE: Command Line OVRPRTF vs. CALL -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Command Line OVRPRTF vs. CALL
From: "Craig Jacobsen" <CraigJacobsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:40:36 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Put the WRKQRY in the CLP right after the override.

The override you are calling is at a higher level than the WRKQRY.

HTH,

Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Cavaiani
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:35 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Command Line OVRPRTF vs. CALL

OVRPRTF FILE(QPQUPRFIL) DUPLEX(*TUMBLE)

When I key the above on a command line just before I do a WRKQRY (which
prints), then the "tumble" works fine.

I have created a CLP (with the exact same command as above), but when I
"CALL THATCLP" - the override does not take?

Don F. Cavaiani
IT Manager
Amerequip Corp.
920-894-7063

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.