|
From Lucas B.:
I, personally, am really allergic to this way of reasoning, because it
boils down to "we're vendor locked to RPG code, and this is why we're
using a System i". Vendor lock-in is never a good thing, but there are
some advantages when doing so.
But nonetheless, nobody WANTS vendor lock-in.
In my opinion, this is NOT a good way to sell the System i to new
businesses - you can use this internally to tell management that they
should buy a new System i and then don't have to switch from their
legacy 5250 BASIC/RPG to a more modern solution, or can phase the
migration from this application to the new generation using HATS, or
even a new version of the software that e.g. uses Java. Parallel
deployment of the new software solution while still using the same
database, etc.
Does a new customer know what RPG is? No. Maybe they've heard of
it as a legacy language used by some older IBM mainframes, but the
average non-System i zealot believes RPG to be dead and only used
in legacy systems. Yes, you can write modern CGI web application with
AJAX and all the funny stuff in RPG - but do you really want to? The
answer is only yes if the only thing you can do well is write RPG code
(every problem looks like a nail if the only tool you have is a hammer).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.