×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
SSL to a web server requires 7.1, SSL VPN doesn't. This is my understanding.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of R Bruce Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:16 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Remote access between firewalls
SSL through the PIX to the web page would just be a static mapping, plain
old NAT/PAT... the benefit there would be that no client is required and
anyone with a password can use it, unless you are also deploying client
certificates. You're just passing security on to the web server.
That, by itself, and the client through the PIX, don't require 7.1 so I'm
curious... what's driving the 7.1 upgrade? (Not that it's a bad thing...)
Burns, Bryan wrote:
I'm also looking at doing an SSL connection through the PIX to a webpage that
a user signs on to. From there, they'll just use an emulator like Mochasoft.
That's what our consultant recommended. We'll have to upgrade the PIX to 7.1
though.
Any thoughts on this one?
Thanks,
Bryan
midrange.com
