Re: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !!

["Michael Ryan" <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Or a change to a class.

On 4/25/07, Paul Nelson <nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sounds like a rogue operator
>
> Paul Nelson
> Cell 708-670-6978
> Office 708-425-4198
> nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of c.chambers@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:23 AM
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Interactive job adopting priority 89 !!
>
> We had a situation whereby all interactive jobs seemed to adopt the
> priority of 89 (rather than the default 20 they normally run under) and
> all sessions seemed to grind to halt - understandably.
>
>
>
> Is this an automatic action taken by OS400 when certain conditions are
> met - or do we have a rogue operator changing the priorities ?
>
>
>
> Ideas??
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.