Re: Will DB2 be moved to PASE also? -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Will DB2 be moved to PASE also?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:17:14 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Statements like "...is PROBABLY more feature rich..." catch my eye.

Is XML part of the standards?  Or is it an extension to the standards? 
Sort of like this:
Resource 
   ID     Option  Feature  Description 
5722DE1   2        5050    DB2 UDB XML Extender

Maybe a database in PASE would not use /QSYS.LIB/* but would use some 
other directory.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Will DB2 be moved to PASE also? , Steve Richter

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.