|
On 2/20/07, Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lukas - unless you have worked in IBM and know this because you have seen it, this is unfounded claptrap - sorry - it just makes more trouble than we need. I've been there, I know some of the people in Rochester, and they don't deserve this kind of unsupported accusation.
what about saying system i IBM lacks a sense of urgency? Jarman and Herring, or whoever is in charge, are not getting the job done. CL cant call stored procedures and receive back results, much of the OS is not threadsafe which prevents Java from being used in place of RPG, RPG SQL does not support receiving result sets back from stored procedures. Today, Intel is advertising core2 quad microprocessors on the front page of the WSJ. IBM has arguably the best hardware engineers in the business, yet the system i execs insist on selling systems that are throttled down to a fraction of their power. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
