Should I have more PTF Groups? -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Should I have more PTF Groups?
From: "Gerald Magnuson" <gmagnuson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:06:37 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>


I'm at V5R4.

When I do a WRKPTFGRP I only See
SF99540 (CUME), SF99539 (HIPER), and SF99504 (DB2).

Shouldn't I have the other groups as well?
Java, Websphere, etc...

I see that there is an API to create new groups, but I would
Think there is something else to get the other groups listed...


Thanks
Gerald Magnuson

Follow-Ups:

Re: Should I have more PTF Groups? , Jim Franz
Re: Should I have more PTF Groups? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.