× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Rob--

It's the +/- XX% manufacturing tolerances-- That's why duplicating a backup that spans more than one tape (DUPTAP) requires starting at tape 1 and proceeding thru the volumes-- no fair duplicating 2 tapes on 2 separate tape drives!

It's also the compression/compaction of your data; how much 'air' can be compressed out of it.

It's also the number of files you're writing to the tape-- each file has headers, trailers, tape marks, etc. associated with it, plus inter-file spaces. These can add up and change the apparent capacity of the tape.

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



It's kind of weird.  Some tapes (same format, make, manufacturer, etc)
seems to hold more before the next tape is loaded.  Could be quite
significant.  And I suspect that a manufacturer does a reasonable job of
having the same length of tape on every cartridge - give or take only a
small manufacturing variance.  I wonder if the figures quoted on the
report are data before compression and/or compaction by the device.  And
some data compresses more.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.