×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




there is some good info in chapt. 15 of the v5r4 performance manual.

As I recall the device itself runs twice as fast as lto2.
After that it depends on bus and controller speed, and the type of data you are saving.

http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/perfmgmt/resource.html

Bryan


Haase, Justin C. said the following on 2/5/2007 10:25 AM:
Ok - because we have basically the same situation and noticed a
significant difference from LTO2 to LTO3.  Like night and day, really.
We have the fiber IOA on its own bus with its own IOP - keeps it away
from the disk controllers.  Can't wait for LTO4!

Justin C. Haase - Solution Engineer
IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i
Kingland Systems Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:14 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: 3576 tape drive and LTO2 vs LTO3

Not a silly question, but yes, we are using LTO3 tapes.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.