CLP source vs. CLLE source -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: CLP source vs. CLLE source
From: Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:12:17 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

CLP source vs. CLLE source

I would like to read a general discussion in this area, so my questionis quite general:


Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP?  Or CLP over CLLE?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source , David Gibbs
RE: CLP source vs. CLLE source , Elvis Budimlic
Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source , James H H Lampert
Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source , smorrison
Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source , Tom Liotta
RE: CLP source vs. CLLE source , Turnidge, Dave

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.