× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Printers are more the limiting factor for remote sites than green screen sessions. Just a few high-speed printers can eat up all of your bandwidth very quickly. IBM used to publish a set of guidelines for SDLC circuits by printer model but I wouldn't know where to begin to look for it.

The upstream 384 should be more than adequate. I'm assuming that the central site has a T-1 or larger connection. I would not use DSL at the central site.

Jim Franz wrote:
How many users in a remote office can one reasonably support with a business dsl circuit 3.0 mbps downstream and 384 kbps upstream?
Each pc using Client Access (telnet).
Looking for actual experiences. This is for 2 remote sites of 5 or so users each, and would be similar dsl at both iSeries & each remote site. Moderate accounting usage all day. Is dsl too light for this? The 384 upstream scares me. Would plan some level of router to router tunnel.
Jim Franz

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.